To say it James Gunnhistory with Marvel Cinematic Universe was stormy would be a massive understatement. After two hugely successful critical and financial hits, Gunn was shockedly fired as director Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 for a series of controversial tweets he made a decade earlier. Although Gunn was eventually reinstated as director of the series, he took time off from Marvel to direct a film for the studio’s main competitor in D.C. Suicide Squad. As Gunn leaves the MCU for good to become DC’s new creative head of studios, it’s becoming more apparent than ever before that his uniquely weird sensibility is what the franchise really needs right now.

COLLIDER VIDEO OF THE DAY

SCROLL TO CONTINUE CONTENT

Creative quality failures during Marvel’s post-pandemic era stemmed from a refusal to heed the lessons left behind. guardians of the galaxy And Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2. These two films proved that it was possible to make a piece that functions like a Marvel movie but reflects the director’s vision. It was the formula for making the best films in the franchise, but few filmmakers have been given the same opportunity since then. It became clear that a franchise that focuses so heavily on internal coherence must value individuality, as James Gunn proved. This means that everything must remain strange!

MCU accepts James Gunn’s directorial vision

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.  3 Karen Gillan Chris Pratt Daniela Melchior Zoe Saldanha
Image via Marvel Studios

Early on, the MCU was much more open to different interpretations; Thor undoubtedly a Shakespearean epic inspired by Kenneth Bragnainterest in acting iron Man bears resemblance to John Favreauearly dark comedies Joe Johnston paid tribute to his past Captain America: The First AvengerAnd Avengers still felt like an epic crossover that Joss Whedon would have been featured on one of his TV shows. However, the franchise’s reliance on one formula threatened to destroy it, and guardians of the galaxy When he debuted in 2014, it was like a breath of fresh air. Gunn worked within multiple parameters, including multiple credits and creating an infinity saga as he intended, but it was a wacky team inspired by a 1970s camping adventure. based on an obscure line of characters that most of the general public have never heard of. He was considered an outsider, and Gunn proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that audiences were ready for a major change in tone.

In particular, guardians of the galaxy provided a gateway for those who have not logged into the MCU before. While it’s fun to see these series linking to each other, it can be overwhelming for those who are catching up to be told they need to watch over thirty movies, countless hours of streaming shows, and stay up to date with future events that are being set. Who only wants to look guardians of the galaxy movies are content with that; while they may miss a few mentions of other character appearances, guardians of the galaxy The trilogy tells a complete story arc on its own. Which can’t be said for any other standalone series or film in the franchise; Certainly, Captain America: Civil War it’s a great movie, but you can’t expect anyone to watch it if they don’t recognize all the characters in the massive final brawl.

Unfortunately, some of the filmmakers who were originally willing to take the risk weren’t able to hold onto them in the same way that Gunn was. Bye Ryan Coogler created a revolutionary cultural moment for black cinema with Black Panther, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever was weighed down with connections to other films, Disney+ character cameos, and the creation of the future, but did not do enough to support the present. Taika Waititi completely radicalizes Thor franchise with its comedy space opera Thor: Ragnarokbut almost impossible to see Thor: Love and Thunder felt like a project he made out of commitment. Scott Derrickson even left the production of a sequel to his horror Doctor Strange movie because it wanted to be too dark, and Marvel’s recent directorial struggle has shown it to be the result of a larger issue. Gunn’s idea was to make a goofy movie inspired by the music and sci-fi movies he grew up with; it didn’t feel like he was doing a to-do list around the house.

James Gunn’s films stand out in the MCU

Interestingly, any questions within guardians of the galaxy the films are inherent in individual franchises, not because of forced ties to other films. Those who objected to Gunn’s decision to make a party film with Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 or the blatant abuse of ill-treated animals that is so inherent Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 respond to specific creative choices, not forced settings imposed on them by the studio. Similarly, post-credits scenes for guardians of the galaxy the films are designed specifically for the future of these characters, and not to advertise another project that does not interest them. The decline in quality during stages four and five showed that reliance on bridging was what hurt it the most. It even affected the box office, which fell seriously. The MCU hasn’t produced anything but runaway hits before, but the Marvel logo alone isn’t enough.

The success of James Gunn is due to the fact that he was doing something safe and pursuing his own creative interests. There was no guarantee that audiences would be invested in a mutable talking raccoon, a sentient tree, a stone-faced monster, a green alien assassin, and a self-proclaimed “loser.” There was certainly a chance that the film’s emotional basis on a soundtrack composed of various pop classics spanning multiple generations would be considered silly. Gunn inserted mature themes into his films; the play mixes father abuse, depression, alcoholism, grief, heartbreak, and gender inequality. Of course, not every director who takes a chance will see favorable results, but isn’t that more interesting than failing because of a pre-set to-do list?